Alternatives to A/B Testing: How It Can Improve Your CXO Program

A/B testing is often seen as the standard for validating conversion rate optimizations (CRO). However, it’s not always the best choice. Especially for companies with limited web traffic or those that need to iterate quickly, achieving reliable results can be difficult. Fortunately, there are several alternatives that can help validate CRO optimizations without relying on A/B testing. We asked Olf, ClickValue’s CRO expert, to share his insights on alternative validation methods that companies can use to enhance their conversion optimization programs.

Why Is A/B Testing Not Always the Best Option for CRO?

Olf: “A/B testing is indeed powerful, but it has some limitations. The main challenge is that you need enough traffic to obtain reliable test results. For websites with fewer visitors, it can take a long time to achieve statistically significant results. This makes A/B testing time-consuming and can hinder you from implementing quick improvements.”

“Moreover, you ideally test one change per A/B test, as this allows you to isolate the impact of that specific change. This becomes especially challenging when you want to implement larger strategic changes.”

What Are the Main Alternatives to A/B Testing to Validate Your CRO Efforts?

Olf: “There are several powerful validation methods you can use to test your optimizations even without A/B testing. Here are a couple of them:”

1. Causal Impact Analysis

Olf: “One of the best alternatives to A/B testing is Causal Impact Analysis. This method uses historical data to measure the impact of a change on conversions. Instead of testing multiple versions of a page, you analyze the effect of a change by comparing trends in traffic and conversions before and after the change.”

“With Causal Impact Analysis, you can see if a change in the layout of your website has a measurable effect on conversions, without needing to test multiple versions of the page. You use historical data to isolate and understand the effect of the change.”

“For example, if you’ve adjusted the CTA buttons on your product page, instead of running an A/B test, you can analyze conversions before and after the change. If you see an increase in conversions, isolated from other marketing activities from both you and competitors, you can reasonably assume the change contributed to the performance.”

2. Direct Customer Feedback

Olf: “Another valuable way to validate optimizations is by gathering direct customer feedback. Ideally, we do this through usability tests where we invite 100 visitors or respondents to a survey where they view two different versions of a website or page. The advantage of this method is that you get direct opinions from users, which can help you understand why they make certain choices or why they don’t convert on the current pages.”

“Suppose you’ve changed a product page and receive feedback that the product description is unclear. This could be a sign that the change didn’t work as expected, and you may need to adjust the copy again.”

Why Are These Alternatives Effective for CRO?

Olf: “These alternatives are effective because they allow companies to quickly validate optimizations with limited resources, especially when you don’t have enough traffic for A/B testing. They also enable you to iterate quickly and implement changes based on real user data and solid expert insights.”

“They are particularly valuable for fast optimizations that can be implemented right away, without waiting for long test results.”

Is Validation Alone Enough?

Olf: “Absolutely not! We must not overlook the importance of research throughout the entire CXO roadmap. Once you fully understand why you’re making changes to your website, you’ll see far more positive tests in the long term.”

“The most commonly used data sources for this are quantitative and qualitative data, expert reviews, and heuristic evaluations. The real power lies in combining these sources. When you combine these insights, you get not just the ‘what’, but also a clear understanding of the ‘why’. Combined, they will help you elevate the user experience and ultimately improve the bottom line.”

Conclusion: A/B Testing is Not the Only Option for CRO

Olf: “A/B testing is undoubtedly valuable and remains one of the key golden standards within CRO, but it’s not always the best method for every company. When you’re dealing with limited traffic or need to optimize quickly, alternative validation methods like Causal Impact Analysis and direct insights from respondents are effective ways to improve your conversion rate without relying on A/B testing. These alternatives offer the speed and flexibility you need to make informed decisions quickly and strengthen your CRO program.”

Curious about how you can apply these methods to your business? Reach out to us and discover how we can help improve your conversion rate, without waiting weeks for test results.

Emerce conversion 2025 – Hand out